Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano AERO XR C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Shimano AERO XR C3000X stands out for a weight of 210g / 7,41oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX
