Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX stands out for a weight of 155g / 5,47oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX
