Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and durability (5.89 out of 10). While Shimano Catana FE 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
