Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.89 out of 10). Still, Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 260g / 9,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX
