Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano FX
Spinning
52.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano FX 3000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Shimano FX 3000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano FX?
Shimano FX 3000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 6000X
