Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a total score of 7.96 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
