Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 240g / 8,47oz and a ball bearings of 4+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
