Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 265g / 9,35oz and a ball bearings of 4+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
