Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a total score of 7.96 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
