Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
