Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 240g / 8,47oz and a ball bearings of 3+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX
