Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a total score of 7.96 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
