Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sienna 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
51.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Shimano Sienna 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sienna?
Shimano Sienna 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX
