Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Stradic FM
Spinning
1000fmx
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX stands out for a ball bearings of 6+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Stradic FM?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X
