Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X stands out for a weight of 220g / 7,76oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
