Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
85.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX stands out for a weight of 215g / 7,58oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
