Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX stands out for a weight of 180g / 6,35oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
