Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Ultegra C3000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Shimano Ultegra C3000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX
