Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
92.50 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
