Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and total score (7.96 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9.70oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX
