Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
