Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Spinning
37.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag3.0 kg - 6.6 lbs
Weight355 g - 12.5oz
Line retireve per crank86 cm / 33.9 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25-260 / 0.30-180 / 0.35-130 / 0.40-100 lb/yds: 8-240 / 10-200 / 12-160
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Super 4000 GT RD, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and total score (7.96 out of 10). While Shimano Super 4000 GT RD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano Super 4000 GT RD?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
- The 5 out of 10 (4.8:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
