Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
