Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
