Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD
