Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX
