Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Delphin FRIZ


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
