Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
