Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
