Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X
