Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Shimano TLD 25X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX
