Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X
