Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
