Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
