Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
84.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX edges out Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 285g / 10,05oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX
