Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX edges out Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
