Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa BG 6500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Daiwa BG 6500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Daiwa BG 6500X stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa BG?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- With a weight score of 9.19 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz), this reel is impressively light for saltwater and provides great comfort
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
Daiwa BG 6500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX
