Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa Fuego LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €77.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa Fuego LT?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX
