Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
