Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
