Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Delphin FRIZ
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Delphin FRIZ
Spinning
49.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/190
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Delphin FRIZ, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin FRIZ may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Delphin FRIZ?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Delphin FRIZ
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX
