Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Delphin INKS 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Delphin INKS 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Delphin INKS 4000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
