Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
60.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight269g / 9.49oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/350
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X stands out for a ball bearings of 6+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano TLD 20X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
