Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
