Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX
