Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano TLD 15X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX
