Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
