Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a gear ratio of 5.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX


Shimano TLD 25X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD 25X


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX
