Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 6000X
