Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
